Trail of Bits sells researcher-led, multi-disciplinary software-assurance engagements. Its current service page says the team is sized to the threat model and that deliverables can include findings, exploit demonstrations, CI-ready static-analysis rules, fuzzing harnesses, invariant tests, and fix review. Firepan provides automated repository analysis, connected GitHub workflows, and engagement-specific deeper review. The two models differ in reviewer involvement and deliverables.
| Question | Firepan | Trail of Bits | |---|---|---| | Primary input | Public or connected source repository | Agreed system, threat model, and engagement artifacts | | Review model | Deterministic detectors plus AI-assisted repository analysis | Multi-disciplinary specialist team with manual review and custom tooling | | Deliverable | Structured findings, dashboard history, and engagement-specific reports | Written findings plus engagement-specific PoCs, CI rules, harnesses, recommendations, and fix review | | Repository changes | Connected GitHub events can trigger new analysis | Trail of Bits says clients retain delivered tooling; later service scope is proposal-specific | | Pricing | Published Firepan subscription tiers | Request a current Trail of Bits quote |
Choose Trail of Bits when the threat model calls for a specialist team, custom security artifacts, and an engagement-level fix review. Choose Firepan when immediate public-repository triage or repeatable automated checks on connected repository changes are useful. Automated analysis does not replace the researcher judgment described in Trail of Bits' service.
Q: Does Trail of Bits only deliver a PDF?
A: No. Its current Software Assurance page lists executable and CI-oriented artifacts among standard engagement deliverables. Confirm which artifacts apply to your proposal.
Q: Does Firepan run all Trail of Bits tools in every audit?
A: No. Firepan can use Slither as best-effort corroboration when the target compiles; it does not represent Echidna, Medusa, or other external tools as mandatory stages in every run.
Q: Which is cheaper or faster?
A: Firepan publishes subscription tiers and a free surface scan. Trail of Bits scopes a team to the threat model and directs buyers to request a quote. Compare current written scopes; do not use an unsourced price or timeline range.
Firepan
Run a free surface scan — results in minutes, no credit card required.
Run Free Scan →Compare Firepan vs CertiK on review model, repository automation, evidence, scope, and publicly verifiable pricing.
Compare Firepan vs OpenZeppelin on review model, repository automation, evidence, scope, and publicly verifiable pricing.
An honest, side-by-side comparison of the 9 leading smart contract audit firms in 2026 — CertiK, OpenZeppelin, Trail of Bits, Cyfrin, Sherlock, Spearbit, Hacken, Quantstamp, and QuillAudits — on pricing, model, and what each does best.