Cyfrin is a competitive smart contract auditing firm that combines traditional audit services with CodeHawks, a crowdsourced competitive auditing platform. Their approach is community-driven: they post audit contests that invite independent auditors to compete, enabling protocols to get multiple reviewers at lower cost than traditional boutique firms. Cyfrin also conducts direct audits at competitive rates. Their pricing is accessible for early-stage protocols, and their educational content (including courses and guides) strengthens the broader security community. CodeHawks contests typically run 1–3 weeks and attract a diverse auditor pool, surfacing findings from multiple perspectives. Cyfrin is ideal for teams wanting comprehensive audit coverage at lower cost.
Firepan is an AI-powered continuous smart contract security platform that provides 24/7 post-deployment monitoring. Its HOUND AI engine detects vulnerabilities, anomalies, and exploit patterns in real time. Firepan integrates with GitHub for scan-on-push, scanning every commit before merge and catching issues before they reach production. Priced as a monthly subscription, Firepan scales across multiple contracts and provides instant alerts. It prioritizes continuous, rapid threat detection over formal audit ceremonies.
| Feature | Firepan | Cyfrin | |---------|---------|--------| | Monitoring Type | Continuous / always-on | Point-in-time audit contest or engagement | | CI/CD Integration | GitHub integration with scan-on-push | None — off-chain audit only | | AI Engine | HOUND AI engine | Community auditors + automated scanning | | Post-Deployment Monitoring | Yes — real-time alerts | No — pre-launch audit focus | | Pricing Model | SaaS subscription | Per-audit ($5K–$50K+ or CodeHawks contest) | | Time to First Finding | Minutes | 1–3 weeks (CodeHawks) or 2–6 weeks (direct) | | Best For | Continuous scanning + CI/CD | Budget-conscious audit coverage |
Cyfrin offers exceptional value for early-stage teams. CodeHawks contests are crowdsourced, meaning multiple independent auditors review your code — you get breadth of perspective at a fraction of boutique audit cost. This model works especially well for protocols that want competitive finding coverage without the $50K–$100K+ price tag of elite firms. Cyfrin's educational resources also strengthen the security community. If you're bootstrapped and need pre-launch audit coverage, CodeHawks is a smart choice.
Firepan operates in the post-deployment space where Cyfrin stops. After your CodeHawks contest is complete and code goes live, Firepan takes over with continuous 24/7 monitoring. It catches vulnerabilities that emerge post-launch, including contract upgrades, integration changes, zero-day exploit patterns, and unexpected market conditions. Firepan also integrates into your development pipeline — developers see findings before merge, enabling rapid iteration. For teams deploying frequently, Firepan scales to monitor all contracts in parallel. Unlike Cyfrin's time-boxed contests, Firepan runs forever at a predictable monthly cost.
Choose Cyfrin if you:
Choose Firepan if you:
Best practice: Use both. Run a CodeHawks contest (or Cyfrin audit) for pre-launch comprehensive coverage. Deploy Firepan on mainnet for continuous threat detection and rapid iteration.
Q: Is Firepan a replacement for a Cyfrin audit?
A: No. Cyfrin audits examine code pre-launch; Firepan monitors deployed contracts continuously. Use Cyfrin for pre-launch coverage and Firepan for ongoing protection. They serve different phases.
Q: How does Cyfrin compare to Firepan on price?
A: Cyfrin CodeHawks contests are typically $5K–$50K+ and run once. Firepan is a monthly subscription monitoring all your contracts continuously. For ongoing security, Firepan is more cost-effective.
Q: Does Firepan produce audit reports like Cyfrin?
A: Firepan provides real-time findings and dashboards, not formal audit reports. Cyfrin produces professional documentation. For a formal report, choose Cyfrin.
Q: How long does Firepan take compared to Cyfrin?
A: Firepan delivers results in minutes and runs 24/7. CodeHawks contests run 1–3 weeks; direct Cyfrin audits take 2–6 weeks. Firepan is instant and continuous.
Q: Can I use both Firepan and Cyfrin?
A: Yes. Many protocols use Cyfrin/CodeHawks for pre-launch audit certification and Firepan for continuous post-deployment monitoring. The two are complementary.
Cyfrin provides cost-effective pre-launch audit coverage via CodeHawks contests; Firepan provides continuous, real-time monitoring post-deployment. Together, they create an affordable, comprehensive security strategy: use Cyfrin for pre-launch audit breadth, then deploy Firepan for always-on protection.
Start monitoring your deployed contracts continuously with Firepan at https://app.firepan.com/.
Firepan
12,453 contracts secured. 2,851 vulnerabilities blocked. 236 exploits prevented. Run a free surface scan — results in minutes, no credit card required.
Run Free Scan →